- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:37:12 +0100
- To: Alan <afarrenk@tampabay.rr.com>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 10:57:31PM -0400, Alan wrote: > BUT I ran yahoo and microsoft through your program and they are MUCH WORSE > OFF than I am. They had a couple of pages of invalid stuff!! WOW > > Could the "validator" be a crapadator program and just BOGUS?? No, the majority of websites do not follow the published specifications. > Feeling Better Cause nothing is good enough for the w3 crapadator! These spring to mind: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chevrolet.com%2F http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fw3.org%2F http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fgreytower.net http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdorward.me.uk%2F http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fthecoreworlds.net http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fzeldman.com http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.webstandards.org%2F http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdebian.org -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Friday, 24 September 2004 12:37:14 UTC