- From: Carole <caroleanne@designs.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 23:11:29 -0700
- To: Christoffer Kjølbæk <christoffer@kjoelbaek.dk>, www-validator@w3.org
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 20:58:46 +0200, Christoffer Kjølbæk <christoffer@kjoelbaek.dk> wrote: > Hi > > I have some codelinie, like this: > <ol> > <ol> > <li>Linie 3.1</li> > <li>Linie 3.2</li> > </ol> > </ol> > > This gives the error: > > Line 50, column 13: start tag for "LI" omitted, but its declaration does > not permit this > > But, if I write: > <ol> > <li>Linie 3.1</li> > <li>Linie 3.2</li> > </ol> > > Isn't that a bug? I mean, there is no illegal in the code? No, the code is incorrect in the original example. An <ol> or <ul> cannot contain an <ol> or an <ul>, but an <li> can. So, the code would be correct if: <ol> <li> <ol> <li>Linie 3.1</li> <li>Linie 3.2</li> </ol> </li> <li> etc.</li> </ol> Hope this helps, Carole -- Owner, Carole Anne Designs Member Seattle Fashion Core Member International Webmasters Association/HTML Writers Guild Support the Web Accessibility Initiative: http://www.w3.org/WAI/ and the Web Standards Project: http://www.webstandards.org/ Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
Received on Friday, 17 September 2004 07:55:37 UTC