behaviour of validator with script and noscript

Hi all,
I evaluated our new home page for accessibility, http://www.utas.edu.au/, 
and referred the issues found, including invalid HTML (from 
http://validator.w3.org/) to the designer. This person responded as 
follows: Most of the "invalid" code is either an overly strict 
interpretation irrelevant to most web browsers or failure of the tool to 
cope with a valid use of noscript tags. " This person also claimed the same 
for their invalid CSS.

Is this true?

Regards,

Maria Moore

Received on Monday, 11 October 2004 22:55:42 UTC