Re: checklink from Ville Skyttä on 2004-11-24 (www-validator@w3.org from November 2004)

From: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 21:17:42 +0200
To: www-validator@w3.org
Message-Id: <1101323862.16385.73.camel@bobcat.mine.nu>

On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 15:31, olivier Thereaux wrote:

> This is a particular (and rare) instance of a broken server "lying" in 
> its HTTP status codes, and I don't really think it contradicts the 
> statement that 302->200 is *usually* not a problem/error. The link 
> checker could, indeed, add a note that there is "usually nothing to 
> do... and you can double check by hand if you want to be really sure", 
> but my understanding is that it is more or less implied with "usually".
> 
> What do others think?

Seconded.

Received on Wednesday, 24 November 2004 19:17:44 UTC