- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 18:51:33 -0700
- To: Geoffrey Sneddon <geoffers@geoffers.uni.cc>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
Yeah, but if you're smart enough to make your code Valid HTML Strict, you're smart enough to fix the problem. :) --Kynn On May 28, 2004, at 5:24 PM, Geoffrey Sneddon wrote: > > If you document is valid XHTML Strict, it gives you this code: > > <p> > <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer"><img > src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-xhtml10" > alt="Valid XHTML 1.0!" height="31" width="88" /></a> > </p> > > > Which wouldn't validate, this is stupid, you get code for your page > being valid, but the code you are given isn't... > > > -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain http://idyllmtn.com Author, CSS in 24 Hours http://cssin24hours.com Online Campaign Manager http://ByronForCongress.org Inland Anti-Empire Web Log http://inlandantiempire.org AIM: NextOfKynn | Cell: (909) 202-9872 | Office: (714) 526-5656
Received on Friday, 28 May 2004 21:51:38 UTC