Re: [VE][338] New Error Message Suggestion from Tim Jackson on 2004-05-24 (www-validator@w3.org from May 2004)

From: Tim Jackson <lists@timj.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 09:26:25 +0100
To: www-validator@w3.org, Mechai <mech@ivoyze.com>
Message-ID: <E1BSAmv-0003uK-Gk@virt1.clust1.firecluster.net>

Hi Mechai, on Mon, 24 May 2004 15:53:36 +0800 you wrote:

> newReply.asp?forum=1&thread=6
> How can the validator assume an encounter with the ampersands is
> invalid. 

Because it *is* invalid?

> Please kindly look into this problem...

Why do people always assume the validator is wrong, and not that *they*
are wrong?

http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp

(short: you need to use "&amp;" instead of "&")

Tim

Received on Monday, 24 May 2004 04:26:26 UTC