- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 12:24:07 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >Of course the real solution is to add more conformance checking to the >validator […] Yup, and this is a goal for the future that is now actually beginning to emerge over the event horizon for implementation. Expect to see at least some babysteps in that direction over the next couple of major.version releases. BTW, what are you doing reading email? Aren't you supposed to be out waving flags and eating too much candy today? :-) - -- By definition there is _no_way_ any problem can be my fault. Any problems you think you can find in my code are in your imagination. If you continue with such derranged imaginings then I may be forced to perform corrective brain surgery... with an axe! -- Stephen Harris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 iQA/AwUBQKiSxqPyPrIkdfXsEQIFZQCfezda75GBX2iA/9LgGYCk7R9OhhMAoNeZ kQqdXTWyOrN7QOdtbquJujsa =NFvP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 17 May 2004 06:24:36 UTC