Re: Validator doesn't check wellformedness from David Dorward on 2004-03-30 (www-validator@w3.org from March 2004)

From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 18:06:07 +0100
To: Nils_Kilden-Pedersen@Countrywide.Com
Cc: www-validator@w3.org
Message-Id: <1080666366.2149.6.camel@localhost>

On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 17:02, Nils_Kilden-Pedersen@Countrywide.Com wrote:
> It seems that a document that isn't wellformed, but otherwise XHTML

For example?

>  (which is an obvious contradiction in terms), passes the validator as
> valid XHTML. 

And you did read the warnings about the limitations of the validator's
XML support? http://openjade.sourceforge.net/doc/xml.htm

-- 
David Dorward                                 <http://dorward.me.uk/>

Received on Tuesday, 30 March 2004 12:09:36 UTC