Greetings: Using the following screen, I am sending a file for validation: <<...OLE_Obj...>> This is the exact content of the beginning of the file that I am submitting. (Please note the red annotation.) <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd <http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd> "> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <title> Center for Disability - Resource Information </title> <link href="/css/denver no overflow.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /> </head> This is the result that I am getting; please note that it identifies the DOCTYPE and the Encoding that I used. Nevertheless, it says that no encoding was found! <<...OLE_Obj...>> It is interesting to note that the source listing (in line 7) does not show <meta http-equiv="Content-Type", but rather <meta http-equiv="Content-Typ!" [emphasis added]. <<...OLE_Obj...>> Stranger still, sometimes this same file validates just fine, i.e., without a "tentative" warning. Please note that I cannot detect a pattern or any other reason why the same file is sometimes OK and why it sometimes give me the "tentative" warning. I am also getting this same "tentative" warning on many other files that I am submitting, files that have the same heading parameters (although, I also get validation on the exact same files without the "tentative" warning). Is this my problem, or is this occurring with other validation attempts? Thanks, Bob Sullivan 303-844-3313Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2004 18:15:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:58:42 UTC