- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 10:49:55 +0900
- To: www-validator@w3.org Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <7ABDACA6-B5C9-11D8-BCCD-000A95E54002@w3.org>
On Jun 4, 2004, at 9:08, Philip TAYLOR wrote: > Since this text in no way requires or even suggests that an error > message suggestion should form a part of the message, could I > respectfully suggest that there be no more of these "Where is > the error message you are suggesting ?" messages unless and until > the validator uses more explicit link text. You certainly have a point that "new error message suggestion" is provided by the validator, not written down by the sender, however the subject provided in the mailto: link is actually a default subject, and (arguably) I would expect careful people to at least check their message - including subject - before sending the mail. In other words, if there was another default subject such as "feedback on error message [XXX]" or no default subject, I am afraid we'd get a fair share of calls for help without subject or claiming to be feedback. One idea would be to have two links - one for help and another for feedback -. Another idea would be to only give the error number and provide an explanation on how to suggest better error messages in the feedback page. Neither are perfect, so comments and other are much welcome. In the meantime, may the ones annoyed by the wrongly labeled messages be a bit patient with the clueless calls for help, and may the ones annoyed by the annoyed ones be patient too :) Thanks -- olivier
Received on Thursday, 3 June 2004 21:50:06 UTC