W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > July 2004

Re: help with dtds

From: Brenda O'Hagan <brenda@wallace.net.nz>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:53:18 +1200
To: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
Cc: www-validator@w3.org
Message-Id: <200407131653.21986.brenda@wallace.net.nz>

Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:10, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Brenda wrote:
> > No, it doesn't complain about the input tag.  The is only one error about
> > the format parameter inside the input tag.
> Bjoern and I discussed this one on IRC.  I'm not certain, but it seems to
> be a problem with OpenSP, the parser used by the validator.  My previous
> reply was certainly wrong - sorry.
> > here's the entire wap2 page:
> What Content-Type are you sending as?  "text/html" would be wrong.
 Content-Type: text/html
> > <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"/>
> That's not a validation error, but it is bogus.
i'll remove that - came from a php library i'm using.

> Try validating with Page Valet ( http://valet.webthing.com/page/ ).
> That offers you a choice of parsers to validate with.  OpenSP is the
> same underlying parser used in the W3 validator; Xerces offers more
> complete XML support and may declare your document valid.
unfortunatley Page valet only lets me give it a URL - i need an upload 
interface  (my webserver is for a telco's wap site and accessible on the 
internet)  So, i can't parse through there....  i'll have to hunt for some 
other server to host it on in order to validate it.

you have given me some confirmation that i'm not going nuts, and the <input 
format="...." ...> really is in the openwave dtd.
The page works as intended on the telco's phones, so i'm happy to leave it as 
is, but would be nice if it validated in the W3C validator, as my client 
holds it in high regard.

- --Brenda

Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2004 01:12:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:58:43 UTC