Richard, On Feb 18, 2004, at 06:35, Richard Hurrell wrote: > I've just validated a few of my pages with you validator and was > surprised to see if you produce a valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional page > you are allowed to use the W3C XHTML 1.0 logo, but if you go to the > trouble of making it conform to the strict definition you're not > offered the logo to use. Sounds weird indeed. It does work fine for e.g: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FQA Could you tell us the address of the XHTML 1.0 strict you're validating? Thank you -- olivierReceived on Wednesday, 18 February 2004 17:19:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:58:39 UTC