- From: Fabrice Deydier <fabrice@my-industry.net>
- Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 09:01:07 +0100
- To: www-validator@w3.org
Hi Abyss, I have created 3 pages : http://www.my-industry.net/testhtml1.php It's a HTML 4.01 valid page. Look at the tags : <META>, <LINK> and the first <A> http://www.my-industry.net/testhtml2.php I have changed the tags with <META />, etc... The page is not HTML 4.01 valid !!! But it's XHTML 1.0 (transitional) valid. I note that the alone tags <IMG /> and <BR /> are correct. http://www.my-industry.net/testhtml3.php I have closed the tags <META></META>, etc... The page is not HTML 4.01 valid : The V3C validator don't accept the </META> and </LINK> tags. But the <A></A> is correct ! The page is XHTML 1.0 (transitional) valid. Well, I am suprised of the differences between the traitment of the <META>, <LINK>, <A> tags vs <IMG /> or <BR />. An idea ? A+ / K96 Le vendredi 31 décembre 2004 à 08:00:03, vous avez écrit : A> what is the url and i will look at it.... A> ----- Original Message ----- A> From: "Fabrice Deydier" <fabrice@my-industry.net> A> To: <www-validator@w3.org> A> Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 1:46 AM A> Subject: Alone tag >> >> Hi, >> >> I have a problem with the W3 validator. >> >> When I check a HTML 4.01 page with meta tag like this : >> <META blablabla> >> There is no problem. >> If I use <META blablabla></META> or <META blablabla />, the page is >> not valid. >> >> There is the same problem with the <LINK blablabla> tag and the <A >> name="blabla"> tag. >> >> But, with <IMG blabla /> it's ok. >> >> I don't understand the HTML 4.01 standard or it's a bug of the W3 >> validator ? >> >> Thank's for your help. >> >> A+ / K96 >> >> Fabrice - fabrice@my-industry.net >> -- >> http://www.my-industry.net >> A PBEM of virtuals companies >> >> >> >> Fabrice - fabrice@my-industry.net -- http://www.my-industry.net Un jeu de gestion d'entreprises virtuelles
Received on Friday, 31 December 2004 08:01:11 UTC