- From: Monique Brunel <monique.brunel@webmaster-hub.com>
- Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 13:32:46 +0200
- To: www-validator@w3.org
Hi, I had a big discussion with a webmaster on a forum. He said : - target_blank is autorised with XHTML 1.1 - W3C validator is bad :-( So I try to explain, but please excuse my faults, English is not my maternal language. http://www.jsand.net/ is not my own site, so if you look at it, perhaps it will be corrected. But I've saved page's source and validator's results. The doctype is bad : <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> <html> <head> <title>Astuces Windows XP, Programmation, Cours, Photoshop, Webmastering, Programmes, Hacking, Thèmes XP, etc - [JSAND]</title> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" /> <meta name="title" content="JSAND" /> <meta name="author" content="Julien VAUBOURG" /> <meta name="subject" content="Informatique" /> <meta name="description" content="Astuces pour Windows Xp et autres versions, cours HTML, PHP, etc, apprendre à faire un site" /> <meta name="keywords" content="windows, astuces, xp, cours html, cours php, thèmes XP, tutoriaux, webmaster" /> <meta name="language" content="Fr" /> <meta http-equiv="imagetoolbar" content="no" /> <link rel="stylesheet" href="css_jsand.css" type="text/css" /> <script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript" src="jsand.js"></script> </head> and there are links with target_blank in the code and some other mistakes. Howether, validator says : This Page Is Valid -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1 Strict//EN! I've try with WDG validator and this one says : Errors and Warnings * http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/DTD/xhtml-framework-1.mod, line 45, character 55: invalid formal public identifier "-//W3C//NOTATIONS XHTML Notations 1.0//EN": invalid public text class * http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/DTD/xhtml-inlstruct-1.mod, line 33, character 35: omitted tag minimization parameter can be omitted only if "OMITTAG NO" is specified on the SGML declaration [...] The maximum number of errors was reached. Further errors in the document have not been reported. Thanks for your interest and your answer. -- Amicalement, Monique en campagne pour des sites conformes aux standards et accessibles... http://www.webmaster-hub.com/ et des navigateurs évolutifs http://www.mozilla-europe.org/ Pour les amateurs d'athlétisme : http://users.skynet.be/osga/
Received on Sunday, 8 August 2004 12:02:13 UTC