- From: Monique Brunel <monique.brunel@webmaster-hub.com>
- Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 13:32:46 +0200
- To: www-validator@w3.org
Hi,
I had a big discussion with a webmaster on a forum.
He said :
- target_blank is autorised with XHTML 1.1
- W3C validator is bad :-(
So I try to explain, but please excuse my faults, English is not my
maternal language.
http://www.jsand.net/ is not my own site, so if you look at it, perhaps
it will be corrected.
But I've saved page's source and validator's results.
The doctype is bad :
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>Astuces Windows XP, Programmation, Cours, Photoshop,
Webmastering, Programmes, Hacking, Thèmes XP, etc - [JSAND]</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
<meta name="title" content="JSAND" />
<meta name="author" content="Julien VAUBOURG" />
<meta name="subject" content="Informatique" />
<meta name="description" content="Astuces pour Windows Xp et autres
versions, cours HTML, PHP, etc, apprendre à faire un site" />
<meta name="keywords" content="windows, astuces, xp, cours html, cours
php, thèmes XP, tutoriaux, webmaster" />
<meta name="language" content="Fr" />
<meta http-equiv="imagetoolbar" content="no" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="css_jsand.css" type="text/css" />
<script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript"
src="jsand.js"></script>
</head>
and there are links with target_blank in the code and some other mistakes.
Howether, validator says :
This Page Is Valid -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1 Strict//EN!
I've try with WDG validator and this one says :
Errors and Warnings
*
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/DTD/xhtml-framework-1.mod,
line 45, character 55: invalid formal public identifier
"-//W3C//NOTATIONS XHTML Notations 1.0//EN": invalid public text class
*
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/DTD/xhtml-inlstruct-1.mod,
line 33, character 35: omitted tag minimization parameter can be omitted
only if "OMITTAG NO" is specified on the SGML declaration
[...]
The maximum number of errors was reached. Further errors in the document
have not been reported.
Thanks for your interest and your answer.
--
Amicalement,
Monique
en campagne pour des sites conformes aux standards et accessibles...
http://www.webmaster-hub.com/
et des navigateurs évolutifs http://www.mozilla-europe.org/
Pour les amateurs d'athlétisme : http://users.skynet.be/osga/
Received on Sunday, 8 August 2004 12:02:13 UTC