Jukka K. Korpela wrote: >> this is why HTML4 is better-suited to the web today >> than XHTML > Well, the conclusion is surely correct [...] > Few authors understand that e.g. <a name="foo"/>/ > is perfectly valid HTML4. Me and my browser, we don't understand these SGML tricks. That's why I like XHTML better than HTML, and it's quite easy to create XHTML 1.0 pages visible with "any" browser, where "any" includes my good old Netscape 3.x. It's also easy to create scripts for XHTML, parsing XML is straight forward, unlike SGML. Bye, FrankReceived on Monday, 2 August 2004 19:02:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:58:44 UTC