- From: Leo Breebaart <leo@lspace.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 13:19:17 +0000 (UTC)
- To: www-validator@w3.org
Terje Bless <link@pobox.com> writes: > The concept it should get across, in two or preferably a single word, > is that of applying stricter, perhaps excessively so, rules; that does > use still the process of validation, but without implying anything > about the formal validity or lack of it in the results. Perhaps it could be called "pedantic" checking? This not only has a precedent of sorts in the GCC/G++ compiler flag of the same name, but is also, I think, by itself a good layman's one-word encapsulation of the concept as you describe it above: "applying stricter, perhaps excessively so, rules". -- Leo Breebaart <leo@lspace.org>
Received on Monday, 1 September 2003 09:30:55 UTC