www-validator@w3.org from October 2003 by date

Friday, 31 October 2003

• RE: Style tag not validated correctly for HTML 4.01 Jukka K. Korpela

Thursday, 30 October 2003

• RE: Style tag not validated correctly for HTML 4.01 Nick Kew
• Re: HTML 3.2, semicolon missing on ñ Jukka K. Korpela
• HTML 3.2, semicolon missing on ñ Brent Petersen
• RE: Style tag not validated correctly for HTML 4.01 Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Also, a missing dependency Ville Skyttä
• Re: Bad link on the source code page Ville Skyttä
• Also, a missing dependency Fred Emmott
• Bad link on the source code page Fred Emmott
• Validator not useful when encountering "No DOCTYPE specified" error Roland Seuhs
• RE: Style tag not validated correctly for HTML 4.01 Nick Kew

Wednesday, 29 October 2003

• RE: Style tag not validated correctly for HTML 4.01 Gavin Lambert
• RE: Style tag not validated correctly for HTML 4.01 Ville Skyttä
• RE: Style tag not validated correctly for HTML 4.01 Jukka K. Korpela
• RE: Style tag not validated correctly for HTML 4.01 Gavin Lambert
• Re: Style tag not validated correctly for HTML 4.01 Liam Quinn
• Style tag not validated correctly for HTML 4.01 Gavin Lambert

Monday, 27 October 2003

• Re: Possible bug in Validation service Christoph Päper

Sunday, 26 October 2003

• Re: Possible bug in Validation service Bjoern Hoehrmann

Saturday, 25 October 2003

• Re: Possible bug in Validation service Christoph Päper
• Re: Possible bug in Validation service Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Adding an encoding M. P. Premkumar
• Re: Possible bug in Validation service Christoph Päper

Friday, 24 October 2003

• Re: Possible bug in Validation service Saqib Ali
• Re: is this right? Cindy Sue
• Re: Possible bug in Validation service Saqib Ali

Thursday, 23 October 2003

• Possible bug in Validation service Pierre St-Laurent
• framesets and the validator icon Danny Mather
• Re: validation problem Peter Sass
• [VE][404] New Error Message Suggestion Lea de Groot
• Re: is this right? Jim Barter
• Re: is this right? David Dorward
• is this right? Jim Barter

Wednesday, 22 October 2003

• Re: validation problem Stephen R Laniel

Monday, 20 October 2003

• Re: validation problem Peter Sass

Wednesday, 22 October 2003

• re: pre-requisites Ville Skyttä
• re: pre-requisites Tony

Tuesday, 21 October 2003

• http://validator.w3.org/file-upload.html Carsten Möller
• Re: Form Element Select and attribute selected David Dorward
• Form Element Select and attribute selected Ageer, Lenin B

Monday, 20 October 2003

• Re: "Validate this page" and 302 redirects Ville Skyttä
• Re: "Validate this page" and 302 redirects Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Quick problem getting the validator working Chris Hyzer
• "Validate this page" and 302 redirects Oliver White
• Re: checklink: problem regarding _foreign module Ville Skyttä
• Re: validation problem Ville Skyttä
• Re: Quick problem getting the validator working Ville Skyttä
• Biometric Survey Biometric Digest
• Re: validation problem Christoph Päper
• Re: <noscript> not allowed in head ? Christoph Päper
• validation problem PEACOCKG (Staff)
• checklink: problem regarding _foreign module Pinnaka, Muralikrishna
• <noscript> not allowed in head ? George Herson

Sunday, 19 October 2003

• Re: Quick problem getting the validator working Saqib Ali
• Quick problem getting the validator working Chris Hyzer

Saturday, 18 October 2003

• Re: the validator seems to have a bug Liam Quinn

Tuesday, 14 October 2003

• the validator seems to have a bug Laurent Fawer

Saturday, 18 October 2003

• Re: PHP session IDs and the dreaded ampersand David Dorward
• PHP session IDs and the dreaded ampersand Simon Oliver
• Re: URL not supported by this version---- DTD did not contain element declaration for document type Ed Martin
• Re: URL not supported by this version---- DTD did not contain element declaration for document type Saqib Ali
• URL not supported by this version---- DTD did not contain element declaration for document type Ed Martin

Friday, 17 October 2003

• Re: Timeout Error olivier Thereaux
• Timeout Error John and Margaret Horton

Wednesday, 15 October 2003

• Re: Validator in PHP Saqib Ali

Tuesday, 14 October 2003

• coolo web search Im12skate
• Re: Latin-9 don't supported from the Validator Ville Skyttä
• Re: [BUG] frag id #not-allowed-contained 404 Ville Skyttä
• Re: Validate Referrer is broken Ville Skyttä
• Re: Not all deprecated IMG attributes caught by validator Nick Kew
• Re: Latin-9 don't supported from the Validator Jukka K. Korpela
• Latin-9 don't supported from the Validator Alessandro Riolo
• Broken link to CSS file in Log Validator output file Brian Kelly
• [BUG] frag id #not-allowed-contained 404 patricka@mkdoc.com

Monday, 13 October 2003

• Validate Referrer is broken Charles Taylor, The Nerd
• Re: Not all deprecated IMG attributes caught by validator Liam Quinn
• Not all deprecated IMG attributes caught by validator Andrew Roazen
• Re: Final print option Dominique Hazaël-Massieux
• Re: Simple suggestion Eric Anderson

Sunday, 12 October 2003

• CSS validator fails too (Re: Validator doesn't validate http://vaunt.net, but doesn't show any error) Franci Penov
• CSS validator fails too (Re: Validator doesn't validate http://vaunt.net, but doesn't show any error) Franci Penov
• "The right way" Tom Nicolazzo
• Simple suggestion Tom Nicolazzo
• RE: Transparency on file... Pete Tozer
• Re: Validator doesn't validate http://vaunt.net, but doesn't show any error Liam Quinn

Saturday, 11 October 2003

• Validator doesn't validate http://vaunt.net, but doesn't show any error Franci Penov
• Final print option Bruce Cameron

Friday, 10 October 2003

• Re: checklink slowed to a crawl Susan Lesch
• Re: Why isn't this valid? Kevin
• Re: Why isn't this valid? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Why isn't this valid? Benjamen R. Meyer
• Re: checklink slowed to a crawl olivier Thereaux

Thursday, 9 October 2003

• checklink slowed to a crawl Susan Lesch
• Re: Validator misleads content negotiation; prefers CSS Ilya Konstantinov
• Re: Validator misleads content negotiation; prefers CSS Olivier Thereaux

Wednesday, 8 October 2003

• Couple of trivial comments about the Log Validator Brian Kelly

Tuesday, 7 October 2003

• [www-validator] <none> Patrick, Adam
• Re: Validator misleads content negotiation; prefers CSS Ilya Konstantinov

Thursday, 2 October 2003

• Sorry, I don't understand why &#91; is not validated as a correct iso character for the left square bracket pacman1897

Monday, 6 October 2003

• a link to a list of valid minimal documents on the validator page Ruud Steltenpool
• Re: Validator misleads content negotiation; prefers CSS olivier Thereaux

Sunday, 5 October 2003

• Re: "validated" GIF, with real time check Philip TAYLOR [PC336S-H/XP]
• Validator misleads content negotiation; prefers CSS Ilya Konstantinov
• "validated" GIF, with real time check Ruud Steltenpool

Friday, 3 October 2003

• [VE][141] New Error Message Suggestion Amanda Owen

Thursday, 2 October 2003

• Valid XHTML Icon - smaller ? Rafal 'Raf256' Maj
• Re: Validator Bug Grant Husbands

Last message date: Friday, 31 October 2003 02:03:15 UTC