- From: <JAMESICUS@aol.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 19:11:07 EST
- To: www-validator@w3.org
- Message-ID: <b9.388d2531.2cdaeb9b@aol.com>
In a message dated 11/5/03 3:01:49 PM US Mountain Standard Time, jkorpela@cs.tut.fi writes: > I would appreciate it if people got to the point, without trying to be > poetic. ..... > You have carefully constructed yourself a problem, alright. > ..... > You misspelled "unreliable hack". And from your description, it is obvious > that you are intentionally using invalid markup. So what are you > complaining about when you ask a validator to check and report the > validity of your markup, and it does exactly that? ..... > You are. A validator is neither honest nor dishonest. It simply does what > you ask it to do. The question is: why do you use a validator in the first > place, if you _don't_ want reports from invalid constructs? > > Suggested reading on the myths and facts of validation: > http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/html/validation.html > > Regarding the extra spacing, there is a very simple solution: put > form { margin: 0; } > into your style sheet. If you are worried about the small amount of > browsers that don't support this yet, then it's not a validation problem, > and then the real problem is your page design that relies on details of > layout, instead of being flexible. > > -- > Jukka "Yucca" Korpela, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/ > Sounds to me like you have a sour stomach, son -- or delusions of grandeur and and a missapprehension of your self importance. James Pickering
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2003 19:11:12 UTC