- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 05:49:27 +0200
- To: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
- cc: John Dunlop <jdunlop@cis.strath.ac.uk>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 John Dunlop <jdunlop@cis.strath.ac.uk> wrote: >Just another minor quibble. When the validator reports the error >'document type does not allow element "[GI]" here (explain...)', the >link does not point to any part of the error explanation page, thus the >user is left dangling at the top of quite a large document! > >The fragment identifier in question is: "not-allowed-contained". >Probably it should be: "not-allowed". This is actually fixed in the current beta release at <http://validator.w3.org:8001/> (v0.6.2b1), but thanks for the report and please do not hesitate to drop us a note if you find more of these (or any other problem for that matter!). >A testcase that causes this link to appear: >http://www.cis.strath.ac.uk/~jdunlop/textarea.html And thanks for including a clear test case! It makes it sooo much easier to identify the problem. - -- We've gotten to the point where a human-readable, human-editable text format for structured data has become a complex nightmare where somebody can safely say "As many threads on xml-dev have shown, text-based processing of XML is hazardous at best" and be perfectly valid in saying it. -- Tom Bradford -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2 iQA/AwUBPtgmRqPyPrIkdfXsEQJXegCg2qYg2BlvDB3qa4zh/J3r7FJPmIQAnRva JBlENmac3HkjjuZwW/hzYFOG =qv6O -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 23:49:36 UTC