Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Nicolas Roeser wrote: > >I meant that if an otherwise valid page only lacks a DOCTYPE > >declaration, it will be valid after validation, so we need to make clear > >that it would not be valid without fallback to using a DOCTYPE > >declaration. > > Is > > http://validator.w3.org:8001/check?uri=www.bjoernsworld.de/temp/nodoctype.html > > sufficient? Aaah, I see. Yes, it is. Thanks, Bjoern and sorry for any confusion. -- NicolasReceived on Saturday, 24 May 2003 14:50:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:58:34 UTC