Re: [ANN] 0.6.2 Beta #1 of the W3C Markup Validator

Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Nicolas Roeser wrote:
> >I meant that if an otherwise valid page only lacks a DOCTYPE
> >declaration, it will be valid after validation, so we need to make clear
> >that it would not be valid without fallback to using a DOCTYPE
> >declaration.
> 
> Is 
> 
>   http://validator.w3.org:8001/check?uri=www.bjoernsworld.de/temp/nodoctype.html
> 
> sufficient?

Aaah, I see. Yes, it is.
Thanks, Bjoern and sorry for any confusion.
-- 
Nicolas