- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 19:37:31 +0200
- To: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Cc: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>, Nicolas Roeser <n-roeser@gmx.net>
* Terje Bless wrote: >>>I think the fallback feature may come handy for many people who >>>produce/have sites without a DOCTYPE/charset declared. However, it's >>>possible that they don't even bother to fix that when we offer >>>fallback, "because it works as is"... Well, should we care? :-| >> >>You don't convince people to care by stronger emphasis. Empasis is meant >>to help people to understand, not to shout at them if they don't want to >>listen. > >Ah, I suspect that's what Nicolas meant; the error message might be confused >with an informational message (i.e. a message that may safely be ignored) and >stronger emphasis might make it clearer that the message is important. You think users might miss ---> THIS PAGE IS **NOT** VALID <--- ?
Received on Saturday, 24 May 2003 13:37:44 UTC