- From: Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:43:48 +0100 (BST)
- To: "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- cc: James Nash <cirrus@linuxgames.com>, "" <www-validator@w3.org>
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > > To show that I have I usually include your "Valid HTML > > (or whatever)" buttons on my pages as links to your validation service. > > Why? If there were an online spelling checker, would you also link to it? > If yes, why? "This page is in valid and acceptable English (not American English)." > Is there any reason to shout? If you said, for some reason, that the > language of your document is grammatically correct and checked with > MS Word spelling checker (a good idea BTW, provided that you don't take > its judgement as a word of &Deity;), would you write it as an exclamation? Only if the paperclip told me to. > The W3C is not an Internet standards body and does not claim to be. > Although the word "standard" can be used loosely, we should use the phrase > "Internet standard" to refer only to the documents declared as Internet > standards by the relevant organization, namely IETF. Not the IETF. The IESG... L. <http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/><L.Wood@ee.surrey.ac.uk>
Received on Monday, 28 July 2003 09:44:25 UTC