Friday, 28 February 2003
- Re: Installing the validator on OS X
- Re: Installing the validator on OS X
- Re: Installing the validator on OS X
- Re: Installing the validator on OS X
- Re: Installing the validator on OS X
- Re: Possible bug in XHTML 1.1 validator?
- Re: Installing the validator on OS X
- Re: Public Beta Test for the "Log Validator" [beta 1]
- Public Beta Test for the "Log Validator" [beta 1]
- Possible bug in XHTML 1.1 validator?
- Installing the validator on OS X
- Re: Need HTTP help for validator access script
- Need HTTP help for validator access script
Thursday, 27 February 2003
- Re: Why a difference in the way a page is validated when uploaded vs. URL given?????
- Suggesion for the w3 validator error messages.
- Re: CSS Valididated ICON is transparent on right edge
- CSS Valididated ICON is transparent on right edge
- Re: div inside div?
- div inside div?
Wednesday, 26 February 2003
- Self-reference possible with validation service
- Re: W3C Validator Install
- Re: W3C Validator Install
- Re: W3C Validator Install
- Re: W3C Validator Install
- W3C Validator Install
Tuesday, 25 February 2003
- RE: Problem with validator (500 EOF)
- Re: question on validating links from databases
- question on validating links from databases
- Re: Problem with validator (500 EOF)
- re: Validator Services W3C.org
- Re: Broken links
- Broken links
- checklink:
- Re: Problem with validator (500 EOF)
Monday, 24 February 2003
- Re: Problem with validator (500 EOF)
- Re: Problem with validator (500 EOF)
- Re: Problem with validator (500 EOF)
- Re: Problem with validator (500 EOF)
- Re: BUG - The page validate and should not
- BUG - The page validate and should not
- Problem with validator (500 EOF)
Sunday, 23 February 2003
Saturday, 22 February 2003
Friday, 21 February 2003
- Re: Implementation of W3C HTML validator on Intranet (NT and IIS 4)
- Re: Why a difference in the way a page is validated when uploaded vs. URL given?????
- Why a difference in the way a page is validated when uploaded vs. URL given?????
- Re: XHTML validation error
- Re: checklink: possible bug
- Re: WC3 icon link
- Re: Implementation of W3C HTML validator on Intranet (NT and IIS 4)
- Page Valid Reference
- WC3 icon link
Thursday, 20 February 2003
- Thank you!
- checklink: possible bug
- Re: Help from validator?
- Re: Help from validator?
- Re: Strange this happen with slahes in the text (non-markup)
Wednesday, 19 February 2003
Tuesday, 18 February 2003
Monday, 17 February 2003
Sunday, 16 February 2003
Friday, 14 February 2003
- Re: inaccuracies in validator
- Re: Your sample code for adding "valid markup" icons to validating pages often makes them stop validating
- Your sample code for adding "valid markup" icons to validating pages often makes them stop validating
- inaccuracies in validator
Wednesday, 12 February 2003
- Re: validator error?
- Re: validator error?
- validator error?
- Fat Cat Media Events
- Re: Strange this happen with slahes in the text (non-markup)
- Strange this happen with slahes in the text (non-markup)
Tuesday, 11 February 2003
- Re: Licence of validation icons?
- Re: Color declaration and W3 validator
- Re: Validation of "virtual" XHTML documents?
- Re: VI? What's all that about then?
- VI? What's all that about then?
- Re: about your icon iso/iec 15445
- Re: Some wrong HTML code validates correctly.
- about your icon iso/iec 15445
- Re: Not XHTML! How Do I make it so?
- Not XHTML! How Do I make it so?
Monday, 10 February 2003
Tuesday, 11 February 2003
- Re: Validation of "virtual" XHTML documents?
- Color declaration and W3 validator
- Validation of "virtual" XHTML documents?
Monday, 10 February 2003
Sunday, 9 February 2003
Saturday, 8 February 2003
- Re: autodetecting character encoding
- Re: autodetecting character encoding
- autodetecting character encoding
Friday, 7 February 2003
Thursday, 6 February 2003
- Re: Website - page error, in information given
- Re: CSS: An invalid XML character (Unicode: 0xa0) was found
- CSS: An invalid XML character (Unicode: 0xa0) was found
- Re: DOCTYPE help requested..
- DOCTYPE help requested..
- Re: FRAMES
Wednesday, 5 February 2003
Tuesday, 4 February 2003
Wednesday, 5 February 2003
- Re: [timj@gtk.org: link validator error]
- Re: checklink:
- Perversity/erroneous reporting by the www validator
- Re: [timj@gtk.org: link validator error]
- Re: Small bug, don't use <img border=> in ISO/IEC 15445
- Re: Website - page error, in information given
- [timj@gtk.org: link validator error]
- Website - page error, in information given
Tuesday, 4 February 2003
Monday, 3 February 2003
Sunday, 2 February 2003
- Re: checklink: links into RDF bug
- Re: inconsistant validation results between .org and .com?
- Re: inconsistant validation results between .org and .com?
- inconsistant validation results between .org and .com?