Sunday, 31 August 2003
- Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 -
- Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 -
- Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 -
- Re: [VE][247] New Error Message Suggestion
- Re: [VE][247] New Error Message Suggestion
- Re: [VE][247] New Error Message Suggestion
- [VE][247] New Error Message Suggestion
- Re: Validation result uri link encoding
- Re: Validation result uri link encoding
- Re: Validation result uri link encoding
- Validation result uri link encoding
- Suggested help for message #338
- Error Message #247
- RE: Help Wanted: Test Cases for "Fussy" Mode
- Re: Missing DTD's
- Re: Help Wanted: Test Cases for "Fussy" Mode
- Re: Help Wanted: Test Cases for "Fussy" Mode
- Re: Fussy mode (Was Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1)
- Re: Fussy mode (Was Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1)
- Re: New Validator Error Suggestions
- RE: Help Wanted: Test Cases for "Fussy" Mode
Saturday, 30 August 2003
- [beta] The miracles of file uploads...
- Re: Help Wanted: Test Cases for "Fussy" Mode
- Missing DTD's
- Re: shift_jis,iso-8859-1
- Re: Help Wanted: New Name/Interface for "Fussy" Parse Mode
- Re: Help Wanted: New Name/Interface for "Fussy" Parse Mode
- Re: Help Wanted: New Name/Interface for "Fussy" Parse Mode
- Re: Help Wanted: New Name/Interface for "Fussy" Parse Mode
- Re: Help Wanted: Test Cases for "Fussy" Mode
- Re: New Validator Error Suggestions
- Re: Help Wanted: New Name/Interface for "Fussy" Parse Mode
- Re: Help Wanted: New Name/Interface for "Fussy" Parse Mode
- Re: New Validator Error Suggestions
- Help Wanted: Test Cases for "Fussy" Mode
- Help Wanted: New Name/Interface for "Fussy" Parse Mode
- [VE][338] New Error Message Suggestion
- Re: CSS Validator bug.
- Re: CSS Validator bug.
- CSS Validator bug.
- [VE][108] New Error Message Suggestion
- validator not returning any results and some other small issues.
- Re: [VE][127] New Error Message Suggestion
- New Validator Error Suggestions (was: [VE][70] New Error Message Suggestion)
- CatalogueManager: Automatic maintenance of SGML and XML Libraries
Friday, 29 August 2003
- [VE][404] New Error Message Suggestion
- [VE][404] New Error Message Suggestion
- [VE][127] New Error Message Suggestion
- [VE][394] New Error Message Suggestion
- [VE][338] New Error Message Suggestion
- [VE][70] New Error Message Suggestion
- Re: HTML Validator always fails (check script problem)
- Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 -
- Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1
- Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1
- HTML Validator always fails (check script problem)
- Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta
- Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1
- Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1
- Re: Fussy mode (Was Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1)
- Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 - "Zeldman Made Us Do It!" - Is Released!
- Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1
- Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 - "Zeldman Made Us Do It!" - Is Released!
- Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1
- Red Hat (9/Severn beta) RPMs of the validator
- Re: Fussy mode (Was Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1)
- Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1
Thursday, 28 August 2003
- Validator suggestion: show less errors!
- Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta
- Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 - "Zeldman Made Us Do It!" - Is Released!
- Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 - "Zeldman Made Us Do It!" - Is Released!
- Fussy mode (Was Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1)
- Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 - "Zeldman Made Us Do It!" - Is Released!
- Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 - "Zeldman Made Us Do It!" - Is Released!
- Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 - "Zeldman Made Us Do It!" - Is Released!
- RE: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 - "Zeldman Made Us Do It!" - Is Released!
- Re: [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 - "Zeldman Made Us Do It!" - Is Released!
- [VE][64] New Error Message Suggestion
- [ANN] W3C Markup Validator 0.6.5 Beta #1 - "Zeldman Made Us Do It!" - Is Released!
- Re: HTML code for correct HTML pages is incorrect
- Re: [www-validator] <none>
Monday, 25 August 2003
Thursday, 28 August 2003
Wednesday, 27 August 2003
- Re: XML doesn't validate but won't say why...
- Re: [Enh] Help correcting lack of charset info?
- Re: Recognition of WML DTDs
- Re: shift_jis,iso-8859-1
- Re: Misleading (or wrong) messages
- Re: a validator bug?
- Re: [bug] apos delimited fpi
- Re: Suggestion: encoding and doctype tips to the users of validator
Tuesday, 26 August 2003
Saturday, 23 August 2003
Friday, 22 August 2003
Thursday, 21 August 2003
Monday, 18 August 2003
- Re: checklink: http://www.gdgreiss.de/links/links.html
- checklink: http://www.gdgreiss.de/links/links.html
Sunday, 17 August 2003
Saturday, 16 August 2003
Friday, 15 August 2003
Thursday, 14 August 2003
Wednesday, 13 August 2003
Thursday, 14 August 2003
Tuesday, 12 August 2003
- Re: Support for ISO/IEC 15445:2000
- Re: DOCTYPE options on http://validator.w3.org/file-upload.html
- Re: Newbie problems setting up validator
- Re: Translation of the validator's documentation
- Re: DOCTYPE options on http://validator.w3.org/file-upload.html
- Re: DOCTYPE options on http://validator.w3.org/file-upload.html
- Re: Translation of the validator's documentation
- Re: DOCTYPE options on http://validator.w3.org/file-upload.html
- DOCTYPE options on http://validator.w3.org/file-upload.html
- Re: Translation of the validator's documentation
- Translation of the validator's documentation
Monday, 11 August 2003
Sunday, 10 August 2003
Monday, 11 August 2003
Sunday, 10 August 2003
Saturday, 9 August 2003
- Re: Suggestion to make life easier for some users
- Re: Suggestion to make life easier for some users
- Suggestion to make life easier for some users
Friday, 8 August 2003
- Re: help with validator installation on Solaris 2.8 and apache 2.0.46
- Re: help with validator installation on Solaris 2.8 and apache 2.0.46
- Re: Newbie problems setting up validator
- Re: Newbie problems setting up validator
- Re: checklink%3A%20
- Re: Newbie problems setting up validator
- checklink%3A%20
- Re: help with validator installation on Solaris 2.8 and apache 2.0.46
- Re: help with validator installation on Solaris 2.8 and apache 2.0.46
- Re: Newbie problems setting up validator
- Re: Links to "Invalid Page"?
Thursday, 7 August 2003
- Re: suggested enhancement
- Re: help with validator installation on Solaris 2.8 and apache 2.0.46
- Re: suggested enhancement
- Re: Newbie problems setting up validator
- suggested enhancement
- RE: Error in validator: 1st <table> treated differently in XHTML transitional?
- Re: Validation failure
- Error in validator: 1st <table> treated differently in XHTML transitional?
- Validation failure
- Re: HTTPS and user:pass@site URI schemes
- Re: HTTPS and user:pass@site URI schemes
- Re: Links to "Invalid Page"?
- Re: HTTPS and user:pass@site URI schemes
- Re: Small error found
- Re: Your validator is on crack
- Re: HTTPS and user:pass@site URI schemes
- Welcome to the oeea_org group
Wednesday, 6 August 2003
- Re: help with validator installation on Solaris 2.8 and apache 2.0.46
- help with validator installation on Solaris 2.8 and apache 2.0.46
- Newbie problems setting up validator
- Re: Problems validating website
Tuesday, 5 August 2003
- Re: Problems validating website
- Problems validating website
- HTTPS and user:pass@site URI schemes
- [FYI] minor interruption of service, validator.w3.org
Monday, 4 August 2003
Sunday, 3 August 2003
Friday, 1 August 2003
Sunday, 3 August 2003
Saturday, 2 August 2003
- Validator bug
- Links to "Invalid Page"?
- ,validate (Was : Idea for the validators)
- Re: Idea for the validators
Friday, 1 August 2003
- Re: Busted link on source download
- Busted link on source download
- Re: validator.w3.org "is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict"
- validator.w3.org "is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict"
- An error with your page.
- Re: validator does NOT validate XHTML 1.0
- RE: validator does NOT validate XHTML 1.0
- Re: Validator.w3.org dead links
- Re: Validator.w3.org dead links