Tuesday, 29 April 2003
- [www-validator] <none>
- Re: HTML validator : learn from Link checker!
- Re: checklink:
- checklink:
- Re: HTML validator : learn from Link checker!
- Re: gb2312 support broken?
Tuesday, 22 April 2003
Tuesday, 29 April 2003
Monday, 28 April 2003
- gb2312 support broken?
- RE: HTML Form Validates for XHTML 1.0 but W3C icon reference click does not
- Re: HTML Form Validates for XHTML 1.0 but W3C icon reference click does not
- HTML Form Validates for XHTML 1.0 but W3C icon reference click does not
Sunday, 27 April 2003
- Re: please add HTTP_ACCEPT = application/xhtml+xml,text/html
- Re: please add HTTP_ACCEPT = application/xhtml+xml,text/html
- Re: please add HTTP_ACCEPT = application/xhtml+xml,text/html
Saturday, 26 April 2003
- Re: [x]html head parsing bug in validator
- Re: [x]html head parsing bug in validator
- Re: [x]html head parsing bug in validator
- Re: [x]html head parsing bug in validator
- Re: [x]html head parsing bug in validator
- Re: [x]html head parsing bug in validator
- [x]html head parsing bug in validator
- Re: Spam from HTMLCodeTutorial
Friday, 25 April 2003
Thursday, 24 April 2003
- Re: Utf-8 support for local file validation
- Utf-8 support for local file validation
- Validating the validator
Wednesday, 23 April 2003
- Re: please add HTTP_ACCEPT = application/xhtml+xml,text/html
- please add HTTP_ACCEPT = application/xhtml+xml,text/html
- RE: Grand unified entity definition set [was: Errors in MathML DT D]
Tuesday, 22 April 2003
Monday, 21 April 2003
- Re: "px" in the width/height attribute for IMG
- Re: "px" in the width/height attribute for IMG
- "px" in the width/height attribute for IMG
- Validation Graphic's <A> tag
Saturday, 19 April 2003
Sunday, 20 April 2003
- Re: Errors in MathML DTD
- Re: Self-reference possible with validation service
- Re: Errors in MathML DTD
- Re: Errors in MathML DTD
- Re: HTML 4.01 icon
Saturday, 19 April 2003
- Re: Errors in MathML DTD
- Re: Errors in MathML DTD
- Re: I think I've found a file that fails & shouldn't
- Re: Errors in MathML DTD
- Re: Errors in MathML DTD
- Re: Errors in MathML DTD
- Re: css with xhtml-prologue
- Re: Errors in MathML DTD
Friday, 18 April 2003
Saturday, 19 April 2003
- Re: Error messages regressed?
- Re: iso_8859-1
- Re: Validation of "virtual" XHTML documents?
- Re: Licence of validation icons?
- Re: css with xhtml-prologue
- Re: BOM for UTF-8 should produce warning
- Re: Encoding names in validator...
- Re: Validating & in urls
- Re: Wording on the validator site
- Re: validation of whitespace before the XML prologue
- Re: Broken Links on the Webpage
- Re: French Interface?
Friday, 18 April 2003
- Re: SVG 1.0 DTD has been updated
- A Presidential Prayer Song -- Listen & Pray!
- Re: Transparency of "valid-html401.png"
- Re: Validation issue
- Re: Unsupported ISO 8859 Encodings
- Re: ks_c_5601-1987
- Re: errors
- Re: Errors in MathML DTD
- Re: Embedding Flash (was: [www-validator] <none>)
- Re: Project about W3C Validator
- Re: strange validation
- Re: Broken links to privacy statements
- Re: Possible Bug
- Re: When HTML content depends on the browser
- Re: Improper use of "Valid HTML" icons
- Re: I think I've found a file that fails & shouldn't
- Re: Validator
- Re: "Validation Results" Page
- Re: I think I've found a file that fails & shouldn't
- Re: Using the validator with internal files
- Re: MarkUp Validation Service page
- Re: Form Element Content in ISO/IEC 15445:2000(ISO-HTML)
- MarkUp Validation Service page
- Re: Form Element Content in ISO/IEC 15445:2000(ISO-HTML)
- Using the validator with internal files
- Re: Form Element Content in ISO/IEC 15445:2000(ISO-HTML)
- Re: Form Element Content in ISO/IEC 15445:2000(ISO-HTML)
- Re: I think I've found a file that fails & shouldn't
- Re: I think I've found a file that fails & shouldn't
- Re: I think I've found a file that fails & shouldn't
- Re: I think I've found a file that fails & shouldn't
- Re: I think I've found a file that fails & shouldn't
- Re: Is this an error in validator ?
- Is this an error in validator ?
- Re: I think I've found a file that fails & shouldn't
- Re: I think I've found a file that fails & shouldn't
- Re: I think I've found a file that fails & shouldn't
- Re: I think I've found a file that fails & shouldn't
- Re: I think I've found a file that fails & shouldn't
- I think I've found a file that fails & shouldn't
Wednesday, 16 April 2003
- Re: Validator bug with JavaScript loop code
- Re: checklink: Usually the sign of a malformed URL that cannot be parsed by the server
- Re: checklink: Usually the sign of a malformed URL that cannot be parsed by the server
- checklink: Usually the sign of a malformed URL that cannot be parsed by the server
- Validator bug with JavaScript loop code
Tuesday, 15 April 2003
- "Validation Results" Page
- RE: Validation issues
- RE: Validation issues
- RE: Validation issues
- RE: Validation issues
- Re: Validation issues
- RE: Validation issues
- Re: Validation issues
- Validation issues
Monday, 14 April 2003
Sunday, 13 April 2003
- Validator
- Re: utf-8 validation error
- Re: Improper use of "Valid HTML" icons
- Re: Validator Problem.
- Re: Improper use of "Valid HTML" icons
- Re: Inconsistency in behavior
- Inconsistency in behavior
Saturday, 12 April 2003
Friday, 11 April 2003
- Re: Strict HTML 4.0 and target
- Strict HTML 4.0 and target
- When HTML content depends on the browser
- Re: Possible Bug
- Re: Possible Bug
- Re: Broken links to privacy statements
- Re: bad link
- Re: Out of Date Source Tarball?
- Re: Minor correction in the XHTML output
- Re: ISO validation
Thursday, 10 April 2003
- Out of Date Source Tarball?
- strange validation
- Project about W3C Validator
- Unsupported ISO 8859 Encodings
Wednesday, 9 April 2003
Saturday, 5 April 2003
Wednesday, 9 April 2003
Tuesday, 8 April 2003
- Re: utf-8 validation error
- Re: utf-8 validation error
- ISO validation
- Re: utf-8 validation error
- Re: utf-8 validation error
- Re: utf-8 validation error
- Re: utf-8 validation error
- Re: utf-8 validation error
- Re: utf-8 validation error
- Re: Errors in MathML DTD
Monday, 7 April 2003
- utf-8 validation error
- Errors in MathML DTD
- Re: Validator that is "less pedantic" ?
- Re: Validator that is "less pedantic" ?
- Re: Validator that is "less pedantic" ?