On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Lloyd Wood wrote: > On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Liam Quinn wrote: > > > On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Lloyd Wood wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Olivier Thereaux wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 04, 2002, Lloyd Wood wrote: > > > > > > Your server is sending the header > > > > > > Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii > > > > > > which overrides the charset specified within the HTML document. > > > > > > > > > > Surely the charset in the document should take precedence? > > > > > > > > No, see http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/charset.html#h-5.2.2 > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > I can't decide if that's a very subtle way to get Content-Type used > > > properly, or just very very broken. > > > > Well, consider a server (such as the original poster's) that transcodes > > HTML pages on-the-fly according to the capabilities of the client. It's > > trivial for the server to set the charset in the HTTP header, but changing > > a <meta> tag within the HTML document is much more difficult, especially > > when almost all HTML documents are invalid. > > In your example, how does the server know what charset to transcode > the page _from_? The server could use something like Apache's AddCharset directive, or it could use language-specific heuristics to detect the original character encoding. I don't know what the original poster's server does, but if you understand Czech (I don't), the answer may be here: http://www.csacek.cz/ -- Liam QuinnReceived on Wednesday, 4 September 2002 12:33:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:58:29 UTC