Tuesday, 1 October 2002
Monday, 30 September 2002
Saturday, 28 September 2002
Friday, 27 September 2002
Thursday, 26 September 2002
- HTML Validator
- nested lists
- XML Detection
- RE: Linking to HTML Validation service from client application
- Re: bug report (corrected :-)
- Re: bug report (corrected :-)
- bug report (corrected :-)
- Re: Linking to HTML Validation service from client application
- can you speak english ?
- Re: Linking to HTML Validation service from client application
- Linking to HTML Validation service from client application
- Re: checklink.pl patch
Wednesday, 25 September 2002
Tuesday, 24 September 2002
Monday, 23 September 2002
- Re: BASE and IMG and [X]HTML
- Re: BASE and IMG and [X]HTML
- Re: BASE and IMG and [X]HTML
- BASE and IMG and [X]HTML
Sunday, 22 September 2002
Saturday, 21 September 2002
Thursday, 19 September 2002
Wednesday, 18 September 2002
Tuesday, 17 September 2002
- XHTML 1.1 support
- Re: Suggestion: Batch validation
- Re: Suggestion: Batch validation
- Re: http://validator.w3.org/ bug with <style id>
- Re: http://validator.w3.org/ bug with <style id>
- http://validator.w3.org/ bug with <style id>
Monday, 16 September 2002
- Re: Validator fails horribly on ill-formed XMLDecls
- Suggestion: Batch validation
- Re: image map validates, but doesn't work in Moz
- Re: justification for producing valid [X]HTML?
Sunday, 15 September 2002
- Validator fails horribly on ill-formed XMLDecls
- Re: image map validates, but doesn't work in Moz
- image map validates, but doesn't work in Moz
- image map validates, but doesn't work in Moz
Friday, 13 September 2002
- checking someone else's page with no referrer
- Re: justification for producing valid [X]HTML?
- justification for producing valid [X]HTML?
- Re: minor bug in http://validator.w3.org/check/referer
Thursday, 12 September 2002
- pb with validator
- Re: HTML 4.0 Transitional validation not completely compliant to
- minor bug in http://validator.w3.org/check/referer
- Re: aligning Tables right in HTML 4.01 Strict...?
- RE: aligning Tables right in HTML 4.01 Strict...?
- RE: aligning Tables right in HTML 4.01 Strict...?
- Re: HTML 4.0 Transitional validation not completely compliant to
- Re: HTML 4.0 Transitional validation not completely compliant to
- Re: HTML 4.0 Transitional validation not completely compliant to
- Re: HTML 4.0 Transitional validation not completely compliant to
- Re: HTML 4.0 Transitional validation not completely compliant to
- Re: Centring Tables in HTML 4.01 Strict...? or rather align right:
- Re: HTML 4.0 Transitional validation not completely compliant to
- Re: Centring Tables in HTML 4.01 Strict...? or rather align right:
- HTML 4.0 Transitional validation not completely compliant to
Wednesday, 11 September 2002
- Re: Problem using linkchecker in doucment containing <BASE> element
- Problem using linkchecker in doucment containing <BASE> element
Saturday, 7 September 2002
Thursday, 5 September 2002
- <http://validator.w3.org/check/foo> is broken?
- Re: proxy setup
- Misplaced spaces in outline
- Re: proxy setup
- Re: possible bug in the validator?
- Re: possible bug in the validator?
- Re: Possible bug?
Wednesday, 4 September 2002
- Possible bug?
- Re[2]: possible bug in the validator?
- HTML 4.01 Frameset validation
- Re: possible bug in the validator?
- Re: possible bug in the validator?
- Re: possible bug in the validator?
- Bug: "doctype" in lowercase is not recognized
- Re: possible bug in the validator?
- Re: possible bug in the validator?
- Re: possible bug in the validator?
- Re: possible bug in the validator?
- Re: possible bug in the validator?
- Proxy authentication
- Re: Recommended insert inappropriate for XHTML 1.1 pages
- Re: possible bug in the validator?
- proxy setup
- Re: possible bug in the validator?
- Re: possible bug in the validator?
- Recommended insert inappropriate for XHTML 1.1 pages
- Re: possible bug in the validator?
- checklink: "radio" input type is an anchor?
Tuesday, 3 September 2002
- Re: possible bug in the validator?
- possible bug in the validator?
- Re: Apostrophe Chokes XHTML Validator...
Monday, 2 September 2002
- just an odd little thing...
- Re: Valid HTML 4.01? need explanation!
- Re: Apostrophe Chokes XHTML Validator...
- Re: W3C "cannot interpret as utf-8"
- Re: Valid HTML 4.01? need explanation!
- Valid HTML 4.01? need explanation!
Sunday, 1 September 2002
- Re: A real validator and the validator online at htmlhelp have a bug in a name
- W3C "cannot interpret as utf-8"
Saturday, 31 August 2002
- A real validator and the validator online at htmlhelp have a bug in a name
- Apostrophe Chokes XHTML Validator...