Sunday, 1 December 2002
- Re: Todo list (was: sgml-lib/REC-xhtml1-20000126/xhtml1-transitional.dtd)
- Todo list (was: sgml-lib/REC-xhtml1-20000126/xhtml1-transitional.dtd)
Saturday, 30 November 2002
- Re: automated queries
- Re: automated queries
- Re: automated queries
- Re: automated queries
- automated queries
- Re: Link to tidy on-line?
- Re: information
- Re: The Validator page is invalid!
- information
- The Validator page is invalid!
- Re: new html pages for validator
- Re: new html pages for validator
- Re: new html pages for validator
- new html pages for validator
Friday, 29 November 2002
- Re: outlines no shown (?)
- outlines no shown (?)
- Re: typo in validation page
- Re: Can we have the "type" and "encoding" options back?
- Re: typo in validation page
- Re: Config::General 2.06
- Re: Small bug with latest version of (X)HTML validator
- Re: couldn't validate because first line
- Re: Config::General 2.06
- Re: Can we have the "type" and "encoding" options back?
- Small bug with latest version of (X)HTML validator
Thursday, 28 November 2002
- couldn't validate because first line
- Re: Validator changes: 0_6_0 or HEAD?
- Re: charset x-sjis not supported by validator
- Re: Question on "target"
- Re: Wrong error defn: P containing DIV
- Re: Config::General 2.06
- Re: "SGML Parser" should be checked sooner
- Re: typo in validation page
Wednesday, 27 November 2002
Thursday, 28 November 2002
Wednesday, 27 November 2002
Thursday, 28 November 2002
Wednesday, 27 November 2002
Thursday, 28 November 2002
- Re: validator w3 org bug, unable to detect doctype while provided
- Re: Comments on New Validation Service
- Re: link from Valid XHTML 1.0! button
Wednesday, 27 November 2002
- Re: validator w3 org bug, unable to detect doctype while provided
- Re: validator w3 org bug, unable to detect doctype while provided
- RE: validator w3 org bug, unable to detect doctype while provided
- Re: Can we have the "type" and "encoding" options back?
- Re: Can we have the "type" and "encoding" options back?
- validator w3 org bug, unable to detect doctype while provided
- Re: Comments on New Validation Service
- link from Valid XHTML 1.0! button
- Re: Can we have the "type" and "encoding" options back?
- Re: http://validator.w3.org/favlets.html
- http://validator.w3.org/favlets.html
- Re: Server Software
- Re: Can we have the "type" and "encoding" options back?
- Re: Can we have the "type" and "encoding" options back?
- Re: Opinion/Question
- Re: Comments on New Validation Service
- Re: Server Software
- Re: Nov 26 2002 update possible error
- Nov 26 2002 update possible error
Tuesday, 26 November 2002
- Re: Can we have the "type" and "encoding" options back?
- Re: Opinion/Question
- Re: your new pages - possible problem with Opera
- Re: Server Software
- Re: Opinion/Question
- Re: Comments on New Validation Service
- Re: URI Handling Bug With W3C HTML Validator
- Can we have the "type" and "encoding" options back?
- URI Handling Bug With W3C HTML Validator
- your new pages - possible problem with Opera
- Server Software
- Opinion/Question
- Comments on New Validation Service
- [ANN] New generation of the "Markup Validator" released
Monday, 25 November 2002
- Re: [administrativia] change of anti-spam system for this list
- [administrativia] change of anti-spam system for this list
- Re: Weird file name side effect in validating.
- Re: Some quick ideas
- Re: Fwd : Link rot in http://validator.w3.org/source/
- Fwd : Link rot in http://validator.w3.org/source/
- RE: Some quick ideas
- Re: checklink: no upload file support?
- checklink: no upload file support?
Sunday, 24 November 2002
- Re: css and valid css
- Re: <link /> confuses the validator
- Re: css and valid css
- Re: Weird file name side effect in validating.
- [ANNOUNCE] OpenSP 1.5 Released
- <link /> confuses the validator
- css and valid css
- Weird file name side effect in validating.
- Re: checklink: very nice
- Re: checklink: very nice
- Re: Beta: pre in place of code for icon code
- Re: Beta: outline feature broken
- Re: Beta: outline feature broken
- Re: checklink: very nice
- Re: Minor error in xhtml validator GUI
- Re: uploaded file in beta validator
- Re: checklink: very nice
- Re: Some quick ideas
Saturday, 23 November 2002
Wednesday, 20 November 2002
- Some quick ideas
- Re: Feature Request: missing xmlns, attribute value parsing
- Re: Parse tree error for css validator
- Re: Feature Request: missing xmlns, attribute value parsing
- Re: Parse tree error for css validator
- Feature Request: missing xmlns, attribute value parsing
Tuesday, 19 November 2002
- Re: checklink: very nice
- Re: checklink: very nice
- Re: checklink: very nice
- Re: checklink: very nice
- Re: checklink: very nice
- Re: checklink: very nice
- [ANN] Bug-tracking service for validator(s) now available
- Re: [ANN] W3C MarkUp Validator Beta 3 Released!
- Re: [ANN] W3C MarkUp Validator Beta 3 Released!
- [ANN] W3C MarkUp Validator Beta 3 Released!
- checklink: very nice
Monday, 18 November 2002
Sunday, 17 November 2002
Saturday, 16 November 2002
Friday, 15 November 2002
Thursday, 14 November 2002
Friday, 15 November 2002
Thursday, 14 November 2002
- Re: The beta validator
- Re: The beta validator
- Re: The beta validator
- Re: The beta validator
- Re: The beta validator
- Re: Ampersands (&'s) in URLs...
- Re: The beta validator
- Re: The beta validator
- Re: Ampersands (&'s) in URLs...
- Ampersands (&'s) in URLs...
- Re: validator missing an error
- Re: validator missing an error
- Re: validator missing an error
- Re: validator missing an error
Wednesday, 13 November 2002
Tuesday, 12 November 2002
- Re: The beta validator
- Re: The beta validator
- Re: http://validator.w3.org/check/?uri=http%3A//www.asx.com.au/asx/homepage/index.jsp
- http://validator.w3.org/check/?uri=http%3A//www.asx.com.au/asx/homepage/index.jsp
- The beta validator
- Re: [Beta] Error Message
- Re: xhtml and lang=en identifier
- [Beta] Error Message
- Re: SGML SHORTTAGS Feature usage in HTML 4.x Recommendation.
- Re: xhtml and lang=en identifier
- Re: SGML SHORTTAGS Feature usage in HTML 4.x Recommendation.
Monday, 11 November 2002
Tuesday, 12 November 2002
Monday, 11 November 2002
- SGML SHORTTAGS Feature usage in HTML 4.x Recommendation.
- Re: Validator fails to detect invalid document
- Re: Validator fails to detect invalid document
- Re: example of error that validator misses.
- Re: example of error that validator misses.
- Re: xhtml and lang=en identifier
- Re: xhtml and lang=en identifier
- example of error that validator misses.
- Re: Validator fails to detect invalid document
- Re: Validator fails to detect invalid document
- Re: Validator fails to detect invalid document
- Re: Validator fails to detect invalid document
- Re: xhtml and lang=en identifier
- Re: xhtml and lang=en identifier
- Re: xhtml and lang=en identifier
- Re: xhtml and lang=en identifier
- RE: Why does it say ALL images need alt tags?
- Re: Validator fails to detect invalid document
- Re: Validator fails to detect invalid document
- Re: Why does it say ALL images need alt tags?
- Re: xhtml and lang=en identifier
- Re: Bug: DOCTYPE upeercase vs. lowercase
- Re: Suggestion concerning SP limitations
- Re: oh where, or where, has my weblint gone?
- Re: Why does it say ALL images need alt tags?
- Re: No Character Encoding detected! But Why?
- Re: Validator fails to detect invalid document
- Re: Validator fails to detect invalid document
- Re: No Character Encoding detected! But Why?
- Re: Why does it say ALL images need alt tags?
- RE: Why does it say ALL images need alt tags?
- Why does it say ALL images need alt tags?
- No Character Encoding detected! But Why?
- Re: Validator fails to detect invalid document
- Re: oh where, or where, has my weblint gone?
- Re: Bug: DOCTYPE upeercase vs. lowercase
- Re: Validator fails to detect invalid document
- Re: xhtml and lang=en identifier
- Re: Validator fails to detect invalid document
- Re: Validator fails to detect invalid document
- Re: xhtml and lang=en identifier
- Re: Error: element "form" not allowed here. Need some assistance!
Saturday, 9 November 2002
- Validator fails to detect invalid document
- oh where, or where, has my weblint gone?
- Re: Bug: DOCTYPE upeercase vs. lowercase
- xhtml and lang=en identifier
Friday, 8 November 2002
Sunday, 10 November 2002
Friday, 8 November 2002
Thursday, 7 November 2002
- Bug?
- Re: Beta: "Revalidate" doesn't work for files
- Re: Beta: "Revalidate" doesn't work for files
- Re: defective HTML401 icon
Wednesday, 6 November 2002
- Re: checklink:
- checklink:
- Re: defective HTML401 icon
- Re: Beta: "Revalidate" doesn't work for files
- Re: help for framespacing attribut
- defective HTML401 icon
- Re: Beta: "Revalidate" doesn't work for files
- Re: Beta [RFE]: the validator should take into account Mime-type discrepancies
- Re: Beta [RFE]: the validator should take into account Mime-type discrepancies
- Re: application/xhtml+xml not supported by validator
- application/xhtml+xml not supported by validator
- Re: Beta [RFE]: the validator should take into account Mime-type discrepancies
- help for framespacing attribut
- Beta [RFE]: the validator should take into account Mime-type discrepancies
- Re: Beta: "Revalidate" doesn't work for files
- Beta: "Revalidate" doesn't work for files
Tuesday, 5 November 2002
Monday, 4 November 2002
- Debug option in configuration file broken ?
- Re: bug in checklink
- Re: Beta: Charset attribute
- Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!
- Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!
Sunday, 3 November 2002
- Re: Beta: Character escapes in system identifiers
- Re: Beta: Charset attribute
- Re: Beta: White-space in public identifier
- Re: Two suggestions
- Re: Frame validation
- Re: image dysfunction
- Re: Beta: Character escapes in system identifiers
- Re: Validator in error?
- Re: Two suggestions
Friday, 1 November 2002
Sunday, 3 November 2002
- Beta: Character escapes in system identifiers
- Re: Beta: XHTML 1.0 in XML Schema
- Re: Beta: XHTML 1.0 in XML Schema
Saturday, 2 November 2002
- Beta: White-space in public identifier
- Re: Beta: XHTML 1.0 in XML Schema
- Re: Beta: XHTML 1.0 in XML Schema
- Re: Beta: broken link to tarball
- Re: bug in checklink
- Re: checklink:
- Re: checklink:
- Re: Beta: application/xhtml+xml vs. HTML documents
- Re: Beta: broken link to tarball
- Re: Beta: application/xhtml+xml vs. HTML documents
- Re: Beta: Valid HTML 2.0 icon
- Re: checklink:
- Re: Beta: Charset attribute
- Re: Beta: XHTML 1.0 in XML Schema
- Re: Beta: Charset attribute
- Re: bug in checklink
- Re: Beta: XHTML 1.0 in XML Schema
- Re: Two suggestions
- Re: detailed.html page broken in CVS
Friday, 1 November 2002
- Re: Beta: Charset attribute
- Re: Beta: Charset attribute
- Re: Beta: Invalid docs
- Re: Beta: checklink limit to domain
- Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!
- Beta: checklink limit to domain
- Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!
- Beta: broken link to tarball
- Beta: Invalid docs
- Re: Beta: Charset attribute
- Beta: application/xhtml+xml vs. HTML documents
- Beta: Valid HTML 2.0 icon
- Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!
- Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!
- Re: Beta: Charset attribute
- Re: Beta: Fatal Error: No DOCTYPE specified!
- Re: using w3c valid logo
- Re: Beta: Charset attribute
- Re: checklink:
- using w3c valid logo