Re: Strict Not so strict.

scripsit Karl Dubost:
> At 18:42 +0100 2002-05-23, Nick Kew wrote:
> >They are errors if applied to an element where they are not allowed.
> >
> >If you want stricter validation, strip the DTD down a bit, or use
> >another DTD.
> You can use XHTML 1.1 [1] which is a little bit stricter.
> But you will still have presentational (table [2]) things... XHTML 
> 2.0 is not far away

Be aware, though, that if you need to support legacy browsers XHTML 1.1
will pose problems, because it has eliminated the `name' attribute on
<a> elements.  NS4 cannot hit `id' targets, so links to such anchors
will break.

Thanasis Kinias
Web Developer, Information Technology
Graduate Student, Department of History
Arizona State University
Tempe, Arizona, U.S.A.

Ash nazg durbatulūk, ash nazg gimbatul,
Ash nazg thrakatulūk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul

Received on Thursday, 23 May 2002 14:20:54 UTC