- From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:19:28 +0100 (BST)
- To: Richard Caylor <richardc@transition.com>
- cc: <www-validator@w3.org>
(just to add to Jim's answer) On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Richard Caylor wrote: > probably wouldn't need to bother with the validator. It took me quite a > while to boil it down to a few tags and figure out what it was > complaining about. This is a common problem when you have validated to a loose standard. In this instance, using XHTML would have got you a more meaningful error message. Likewise, a stricter HTML DTD would have helped. -- Nick Kew Available for contract work - Programming, Unix, Networking, Markup, etc.
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 13:19:51 UTC