- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 05:45:26 +0200
- To: "Philip TAYLOR [PC335/O-XP]" <P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk>
- cc: Liam Quinn <liam@htmlhelp.com>, www-validator <www-validator@w3.org>
Philip TAYLOR [PC335/O-XP] <P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk> wrote: >Liam Quinn wrote: > >>URLs are URIs, so the Validator is capable of accepting (a fairly >>restricted set of) URIs. > >But does the Validator accept any URI that is not a URL? If not, then it >would be more accurate to write the the Validator accepts URLs rather >than URIs... > >This was my point... And a very good point it was too, which is why that usage has been changed somewhat in the latest devel versions. :-) -- > ...publicity rights, moral rights, and rights against unfair competition... Well, you've got me there. I have no idea what any of those have to do with SGML. Next you'll be claiming that running NSGMLS constitutes an unauthorized public performance of SGML. -- Richard Tobin
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2002 02:00:57 UTC