- From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 03:00:15 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Gannon Dick <gdick@gte.net>
- cc: <www-validator@w3.org>
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Gannon Dick wrote: > Although it claims to be PUBLIC, none of the validators recognises it. > Should we have it, or is it pure bogus? > > I'm guessing bogus ... did you notice their HTTP 404 error modifies your history list ? No, I didn't get their page (though it's quite possible that some silly trick like that is the reason it failed for me). I just saw the FPI somewhere else (see below). > Normally the sign of a virtual host who does not want to be located, Strange. From their reputation, I thought softquad had a clue (though the markup at <URL:http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/guide/1194.22.htm> suggests otherwise). Why should they be messing about on the dark side? > and certainly one > who should not be publishing PUBLIC DTD's. It would be fine if they'd be so considerate as to publish it, and furnish us with a URL when they use it in a FPI! -- Nick Kew Site Valet - the mark of Quality on the Web. <URL:http://valet.webthing.com/>
Received on Sunday, 27 January 2002 22:20:39 UTC