- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 17:19:50 +0100
- To: Frank Ellermann <frank.ellermann@t-online.de>
- Cc: Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org>, www-validator@w3.org
* Frank Ellermann wrote: >Masayasu Ishikawa wrote: > >> XHTML 1.0 Strict and Transitional share the same namespace >> "http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml". Declaring a namespace doesn't >> help for your purpose. > >Tnx, this explains why 2 of my 3 experiments failed. But the >3rd variant <dummy xmlns=""><base target="_top" /></dummy> >failed too, and this was essentially a copy of an example in >http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/#defaulting (5.2, last part: ><details xmlns=""> etc. </details> within an XHTML <table>). XHTML 1.0 does not define any 'dummy' element.
Received on Saturday, 26 January 2002 10:17:54 UTC