- From: <Darxus@chaosreigns.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:15:20 -0500
- To: www-validator@w3.org
On 01/22, Masayasu Ishikawa wrote: > This is not invalid, as section 7.4.1.2 of SGML says that a start-tag > (in this case an empty-element tag) may be unclosed when it is > immediately followed by an another (start- or end-) tag. See also: The consensus among my friends was "Wow, that's valid ?". On 01/22, Liam Quinn wrote: > If you'd like to check for a missing ">" anyway, you can use the WDG HTML > Validator [*] with warnings enabled. > > [*] http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/ Thank you, that was very useful. I've modified 35 files from its output so far, including some php which generates quite a few others. I have a few more to do that are more involved, and I hit the 100 page limit. I'm guessing if I install the source locally it shouldn't be too difficult to remove the 100 page limit ? Looks like I'll probably be changing my check referer links. -- "Blessed are the cracked, for they shall let in the light." http://www.ChaosReigns.com
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2002 18:15:51 UTC