W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > December 2002

Re: says it's valid, but it isn't even well-formed

From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 20:17:29 +0100
Message-ID: <3DF4EC49.3080503@pinkjuice.com>
To: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
CC: www-validator@w3.org

Nick Kew wrote:

> On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Tobias Reif wrote:
>>this test case
>>   http://www.pinkjuice.com/temp/w3_validator/adjattrs.xhtml
>>I would prefer if the W3C validator interface would offer a choice of 
>>various up-to-date validators, eg libxml's xmllint etc.
> The existing service is based on OpenSP, which has known limitations
> in its XML support.
> A native XML validator based on Xerces is in the pipeline.


I still would like to see additional choices, eg xmllib's xmllint.

> Running it on your testpage generates a summary "not well-formed XML"
> and a single error where you'd expect it.

(In my report, I listed Xerces' error report.)


Received on Monday, 9 December 2002 14:18:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:58:31 UTC