- From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@pinkjuice.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 20:17:29 +0100
- To: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- CC: www-validator@w3.org
Nick Kew wrote: > On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Tobias Reif wrote: > >>this test case >> >> http://www.pinkjuice.com/temp/w3_validator/adjattrs.xhtml >> > >>I would prefer if the W3C validator interface would offer a choice of >>various up-to-date validators, eg libxml's xmllint etc. >> > The existing service is based on OpenSP, which has known limitations > in its XML support. > > A native XML validator based on Xerces is in the pipeline. Great! I still would like to see additional choices, eg xmllib's xmllint. > Running it on your testpage generates a summary "not well-formed XML" > and a single error where you'd expect it. OK. (In my report, I listed Xerces' error report.) Tobi -- http://www.pinkjuice.com/
Received on Monday, 9 December 2002 14:18:53 UTC