- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 02:30:50 +0900
- To: Ville Skytt(wrong string) g(B<ville.skytta@iki.fi>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
At 13:00 02/12/06 +0200, Ville Skytt wrote: >On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 22:46, Martin Duerst wrote: > > > http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Hosts/Keio/ > > What to do: > > HTTP Code returned: 406 > > HTTP Message: Not Acceptable > > Line: 62 > > > > One problem is that the 'What to do' doesn't give any advice. > > This is important because the advice is colored according to > > the severity of the problem. It would be red here, but the red > > is not shown because there is no text that could be given a red > > background. > >Yes. This is already logged as bug #55 [1], and the only, very lame >reason that prevented me from implementing this some time ago [2] was >the uncertainty what exactly should the error text be. Suggestions and >comments still accepted :) Well, I would go with something simple like 'check it out'. Regards, Martin. > > Using either the Accept-Language > > header of the requester or none seems reasonable, but it > > looks like checklink is sending out Accept-Language with > > some arbitrary language (turns out this is english, > >Yes, need to do something about that. I've logged this as bug #110 [3]. > >[1] <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=55> >[2] ><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2002Oct/0022.html> >[3] <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=110> > >Thanks for the suggestions, >-- >\/ille Skytt$Bg(Bville.skytta at iki.fi
Received on Friday, 6 December 2002 14:17:15 UTC