- From: R. Derek Pattison <rderekp@laughing-coyote.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 17:13:56 -0400
- To: "Terje Bless" <link@pobox.com>
- Cc: <www-validator@w3.org>
Sure. I've used the ™ at: http://www.laughing-coyote.com/ko/luc/photos.htm. It displays correctly no matter if I use the ™ or ™ in IE 6, Netscape 6, Netscape 7, Opera 6, and Mozilla 1.0 on my Windows box, so I'm not too concerned right now about how it displays, I just want my pages to validate and to make sure I can use the Character Entity reference for my pages. Thanks again, Derek rderekp@laughing-coyote.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Terje Bless" <link@pobox.com> To: "R. Derek Pattison" <rderekp@laughing-coyote.com> Cc: <www-validator@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 3:31 PM Subject: Re: Character Entity Question > > R. Derek Pattison <rderekp@laughing-coyote.com> wrote: > > >Error: unknown entity "trade" > > > >But, the Character entity reference at > >http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/sgml/entities.html#h-24.3.1 shows: > > > ><!ENTITY trade CDATA "™" -- trade mark sign, U+2122 ISOnum --> > > > >It does validate if I use &8482;, which is what I ended up doing. > > > >Am I reading the reference incorrectly? Is ™ valid, or should I > >use ™ or not use either for valid XHTML? :) > > Can you give me an URI that demonstrates this problem? > > > > -- > > ...publicity rights, moral rights, and rights against unfair competition... > Well, you've got me there. I have no idea what any of those have to do with > SGML. Next you'll be claiming that running NSGMLS constitutes an unauthorized > public performance of SGML. -- Richard Tobin > > >
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2002 17:12:17 UTC