- From: Thanasis Kinias <tkinias@optimalco.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 10:49:50 -0700
- To: www-validator@w3.org
- Cc: bjoern@hoehrmann.de
On 16 Apr 2001 Bj�rn posted: >* Donald Leahy wrote: >>The charecter set used for the Microsoft website 'iso8859-1' >>was verified as not valid, could you look into this, Josh > >ISO_8859-1:1987 can be named iso-ir-100, ISO_8859-1, ISO-8859-1, latin1, >l1, IBM819, CP819, csISOLatin1, where ISO-8859-1 is the preferred MIME >name, iso8859-1 is no valid alias. What's the authority for that? I've been googling and can't find the definitive source. I noticed that GNU's site uses the 'iso8859-1' name, but I'm not going to bring it to their attention without darn good backup. Thanks, -- Thanasis Kinias Web Developer, Information Technology Graduate Student, Department of History Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona, U.S.A. Ash nazg durbatul�k, ash nazg gimbatul, Ash nazg thrakatul�k agh burzum-ishi krimpatul
Received on Friday, 2 August 2002 13:49:47 UTC