Friday, 30 August 2002
Saturday, 31 August 2002
Friday, 30 August 2002
Wednesday, 28 August 2002
Tuesday, 27 August 2002
Monday, 26 August 2002
Sunday, 25 August 2002
- Re: Link in validator reference needs updating
- Link in validator reference needs updating
- Re: XHTML Validation service - a comment
Saturday, 24 August 2002
Friday, 23 August 2002
- Re: XHTML Validation service - a comment
- Re: charset=GB18030
- Re: /etc/w3c/validator.conf
- charset=GB18030
Monday, 19 August 2002
- Re: New MathML DTD
- Re: suggestions from a developers point of view
- Re: validator does NOT validate XHTML 1.0
- Re: The use of W3C Valid X/HTML images
- Re: /etc/w3c/validator.conf
Thursday, 22 August 2002
- Re: incorrect error messages (?)
- Re: incorrect error messages (?)
- Re: Vaidator Issue
- Re: Vaidator Issue
Wednesday, 21 August 2002
- Vaidator Issue
- Re: incorrect error messages (?)
- bug or feature request
- Re: incorrect error messages (?)
Tuesday, 20 August 2002
- incorrect error messages (?)
- Re: ideas for alternative text
- Re: ideas for alternative text
- Re: validator does NOT validate XHTML 1.0
- Re: ideas for alternative text
- Re: ideas for alternative text
- Re: ideas for alternative text
- Re: ideas for alternative text
- Typo in test validator output when no charset encoding specified
- Re: ideas for alternative text
- ideas for alternative text
- Re: validator does NOT validate XHTML 1.0
- Re: name/id namespace
- Re: validator does NOT validate XHTML 1.0
- Re: Numeric character references.
- Re: validator/htdocs/sgml-lib xml.dcl
- Re: Numeric character references.
- Re: Numeric character references.
- Re: name/id namespace
Monday, 19 August 2002
- Numeric character references.
- [checklink] Error in recursive checking
- /etc/w3c/validator.conf
- Re: validator does NOT validate XHTML 1.0
- name/id namespace
- Re: encoding problem
- Re: XHTML Validation service - a comment
- checklink:
- Re: validator does NOT validate XHTML 1.0
- Re: validator does NOT validate XHTML 1.0
Saturday, 17 August 2002
- Re: Quick DOCTYPE Declaration Question
- Quick DOCTYPE Declaration Question
- validator does NOT validate XHTML 1.0
- Re: HTML Validator... Problem?
- Re: Possible bug in W3C HTML validator
Friday, 16 August 2002
Thursday, 15 August 2002
- Re: suggestions from a developers point of view
- Re: suggestions from a developers point of view
- suggestions from a developers point of view
- The use of W3C Valid X/HTML images
Wednesday, 14 August 2002
- XHTML 1.0 reference
- Re: w3c and apache team
- Re: w3c and apache team
- Suggestion for http://validator.w3.org/check/referer
- Re: w3c and apache team
- Re: w3c and apache team
- Re: w3c and apache team
- Re: w3c and apache team
- Re: w3c and apache team
- Re: Validator success gif and problem.
- Re: w3c and apache team
- Re: w3c and apache team
- Re: w3c and apache team
Tuesday, 13 August 2002
- Re: w3c and apache team
- w3c and apache team
- Re: w3c and apache team
- w3c and apache team
- Re: map tag - xhtml validator
- Re: map tag - xhtml validator
- map tag - xhtml validator
- New MathML DTD
- Re: Validator success gif and problem.
- Validator success gif and problem.
- Re: Link Checker Error?
- Re: Link Checker Error?
- Link Checker Error?
- Re: application/xhtml+xml validation?
- Some code to detect charset (for XML, in Java)
- Re: application/xhtml+xml validation?
- Re: application/xhtml+xml validation?
Monday, 12 August 2002
- application/xhtml+xml validation?
- Re: HTML Validator Broke
- Re: HTML Validator Broke
- HTML Validator Broke
Sunday, 11 August 2002
- Re: recommendation for validator
- recommendation for validator
- Re: The validator at w3.org
- The validator at w3.org
Saturday, 10 August 2002
Friday, 9 August 2002
- RE: problem with validator
- RE: problem with validator
- RE: problem with validator
- RE: problem with validator
Thursday, 8 August 2002
- Re: Web Link Checker
- Re: checklink:http://www.guerillasoft.com/Encspot2
- Web Link Checker
- Re: Problem with <FORM> in HTML 4.0 Transitional Validation
- Re: Problem with <FORM> in HTML 4.0 Transitional Validation
- Re: Character Entity Question
- checklink:http://www.guerillasoft.com/Encspot2
- Re: <label> tags around options
- Re: problem with validator
- Problem with <FORM> in HTML 4.0 Transitional Validation
- Re: target attribute of anchor tags
- Re: target attribute of anchor tags
- Re: Character Entity Question
- Re: Character Entity Question
- Re: Character Entity Question
- Re: target attribute of anchor tags
- Re: target attribute of anchor tags
- Re: <label> tags around options
- Re: target attribute of anchor tags
- Re: problem with validator
- Re: problem with validator
- Re: Character Entity Question
- Re: problem with validator
- Character Entity Question
- Re: problem with validator
- Re: problem with validator
- Re: <label> tags around options
- Re: checklink: feature request
- Re: target attribute of anchor tags
- Re: problem with validator
- Re: xhtml validation
- problem with validator
- Re: target attribute of anchor tags
- Re: target attribute of anchor tags
- Re: target attribute of anchor tags
- Re: target attribute of anchor tags
- Re: target attribute of anchor tags
- Re: target attribute of anchor tags
- Re: target attribute of anchor tags
- Re: target attribute of anchor tags
- target attribute of anchor tags
Wednesday, 7 August 2002
Tuesday, 6 August 2002
Wednesday, 7 August 2002
- Re: Validating my HTML code: background= problems
- Re: sgml-lib/REC-xhtml1-20000126/xhtml1-transitional.dtd
Tuesday, 6 August 2002
- Re: Validating my HTML code: background= problems
- Re: Validating my HTML code: background= problems
- Validating my HTML code: background= problems
- sgml-lib/REC-xhtml1-20000126/xhtml1-transitional.dtd
Monday, 5 August 2002
Sunday, 4 August 2002
- Re: What is better to conform to?
- Re: What is better to conform to?
- Re: XHTML following the Compatibility guidelines is not validated as HTML 4.01?
- What is better to conform to?
Saturday, 3 August 2002
Friday, 2 August 2002
Saturday, 3 August 2002
- Re: XHTML following the Compatibility guidelines is not validated as HTML 4.01?
- Re: XHTML following the Compatibility guidelines is not validated as HTML 4.01?
Friday, 2 August 2002
- XHTML following the Compatibility guidelines is not validated as HTML 4.01?
- Re: iso8859-1 vs iso-8859-1
- Re: iso8859-1 vs iso-8859-1
- iso8859-1 vs iso-8859-1