W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > September 2001

Fwd: Why Validate?

From: Michael Bowen <fizzbowen@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 04:06:59 -0700
Message-Id: <>
To: www-validator@w3.org

Could you please provide a more detailed citation for the blind user's 
lawsuit? It would be very interesting to read the specific claims and findings.

Thanks, --MB

At 01:25 2001/09/24, Nick Kew wrote:

>   (2) The perceptive observation "lots of websites out there
>       don't validate - including household-name companies."
>Do remember: household-name companies expect people to visit *because of*
>the name and *in spite of* dreadful websites.  Can you afford that luxury?
>Even if you can, do you want to risk being on the wrong side of a lawsuit
>if your site proves inaccessible to - for instance - a disabled person who
>cannot use a 'conventional' browser?  Accessibility is the law in this
>and other countries.  Whilst validation doesn't guarantee accessibility
>(there is no complete substitute for common sense), it is an important
>component of exercising "due diligence".  It is now just over a year
>since a court first awarded damages to a blind user against the owners
>of a website he found inaccessible (Maguire vs SOCOG, August 2000).
Received on Monday, 24 September 2001 07:07:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:58:24 UTC