On 14.09.01 at 09:52, Peter K. Sheerin <pete@petesguide.com> wrote: >1) Move this "warning" below the success message. > >2) Can you use a different word, such as "caution"? Warning is a bit too >strong. > >3) Can you change the wording to more clearly reflect that the BOM is >allowed to be there, but that some browsers/parsers may have problems, and >that it's the fault of those programs, not the author's coding? No. Yes. Yes. :-) I see your problem and I would like to resolve it. I don't want to move that message -- for several reasons -- but I'll entertain any suggestions on how else to achieve that goal. The other two issues are unproblematic: #2 will be changed to a "Note" and #3 will be reworded to better indicate what the status of the BOM is. >The way that the BOM is supported in this public release changed from >earlier versions on the testing port [...] It did? Remind me: what did we change?Received on Friday, 14 September 2001 13:56:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:58:24 UTC