- From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@deadspam.com>
- Date: 13 Nov 2001 16:11:44 +0800
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html,gnu.emacs.help as well. Wouldn't it be neat if checklink (http://www.w3.org/2000/07/checklink) could be used with GNU Emacs' compile-mode? Well, I sure hope one day they take my advice (like the validator fellow did), and add emacs compile-mode compatible line number output... I did a simple filter, but it would be best if they did it right in the source, instead of us playing catch-up with the output. The idea is to make output like: http://www.egroups.com/group/BoundaryPoint -> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint Lines: 528, 565 Code: 302 -> 200 OK To do: Usually nothing. become: 1994us_can_border.htm:528:-> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint Lines: 528, 565 1994us_can_border.htm:565:-> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint Lines: 528, 565 http://www.egroups.com/group/BoundaryPoint -> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint Lines: 528, 565 Code: 302 -> 200 OK To do: Usually nothing. Or something similar. Here are some lines from a Makefile: /tmp/checklink_live_all: (unset ftp_proxy http_proxy;\ checklink --masquerade . http://www.geocities.com/jidanni/ \ `ls *.htm*|fgrep -v _en.htm`|\ tee $@) cp $@ $@.backup$$$$ checklink_emacs: /tmp/checklink_live_all awk '{this=$$0};\ /^Processing/{file=$$0;sub(".*file://localhost/home/jidanni/geocities/","",file)};\ /Lines: /{remark=$$0;sub("\tLines: [0-9]+$$","",remark);line_no=$$NF;\ print file ":" line_no ":" remark;\ if ($$0 ~/,/){print "$@ boob message: ******** oh no, there are more than one *********"};\ if(last==""){last=this;next}};\ {print last;last=this};\ END{print last}' $? #also if there are many -> -> ->, then we aren't perfect either Anyway, see how much of a fuss it is? and we are only halfway there if we intend to do a complete job. There's now $ validate --emacs why not also make a $ checklink --emacs ? P.S. An artistic nicety about the URL http://www.w3.org/2000/07/checklink: I think it is bad because it seems to have a date hardwired into it. They replied that yes, but they are committed that it is to be one of Berners-Lee's "Cool URLs don't go away" ... well, that's nice, but I still say it _looks_ bad, and may fool users into thinking that there is an "old place to click, never mind". -- http://www.geocities.com/jidanni/ Tel+886-4-25854780
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 12:36:38 UTC