Re: Interesting Error...

Nick Kew wrote:
>>You didn't consider using the W3C's libwww?
>I probably will do that in due course.  But in the short term, it's a
>bigger up-front operation to replace an entire chunk of James Clark's
>original code than to patch it ad-hoc.

I'll bet. AFAICT, most of James' code is a big mess of spaghetti. :-(

Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2001 05:57:37 UTC