On 27.02.01 at 13:33, Liam Quinn <liam@htmlhelp.com> wrote: >On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Nick Kew wrote: > >>Last time I checked, the correct behaviour here is to validate against >>HTML 2.0, but none of them do that. > >I don't think that is correct. The HTML 2.0 standard says [1] "To >identify information as an HTML document conforming to this specification, >each document must start with one of the following document type >declarations." IIRC, we've rehashed this a couple of times and the conclusion was that HTML 2.0 is the _only_ version of HTML that makes the DOCTYPE declaration optional and thus, if you have something that is "HTML", but which doesn't include a DOCTYPE declaration, it is, ipso facto, HTML 2.0.Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2001 01:41:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:58:20 UTC