- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 10:14:07 -0700
- To: Terje Bless <link@tss.no>
- Cc: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>, Christian Smith <csmith@barebones.com>, Esmond Walshe <esmond.walshe@eeng.dcu.ie>, www-validator@w3.org
At 10:11 AM 6/13/2001 , Terje Bless wrote: >However, EARL looks to be a bit immature yet; not to mention utter overkill >for this purpose. Once I grok Notation3 I'll take another look. :-) Well, it's probably overkill for -this- purpose, but when you consider the ability to combine a number of purposes using a common framework, it makes a lot of sense. Now, mind you, I barely grok RDF myself and Notation3 is beyond me. I support EARL in theory, but in practice I suspect I am more lost than you. ;) But the theory is good, and there are brilliant people working on this, so I am all for further development of EARL and I don't feel bad in trying to proselytize for its use! --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com/ Technical Developer Liaison, Reef http://www.reef.com/ Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet http://idyllmtn.com/ Online Instructor, Accessible Web Design http://kynn.com/+d201
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2001 13:18:40 UTC