- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 10:01:58 -0700
- To: Terje Bless <link@tss.no>
- Cc: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>, Christian Smith <csmith@barebones.com>, Esmond Walshe <esmond.walshe@eeng.dcu.ie>, www-validator@w3.org
At 09:47 AM 6/13/2001 , Terje Bless wrote: >On 13.06.01 at 17:25, Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com> wrote: > >Yes. Now the interesting bit is to define our suitable XML format. >If anyone has any ideas I'd _love_ to see them! Have you looked at the Web Accessibility Initiative's developing work on EARL? Evaluation and Repair Language or something like that (they are not quite sure themselves last time I checked) -- it is an RDF- based language for making statements about compliance of a document against one or more specifications. It started as a tool for web accessibility but has broader applications that could be used throughout the W3C, including having the validator produce EARL reports (which could be combined with Bobby reports, hand evaluations, and so on). Here's the EARL web page on W3C: http://www.w3.org/2001/03/earl/ Here's what I wrote about EARL last month: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2001AprJun/0506.html -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com/ Technical Developer Liaison, Reef http://www.reef.com/ Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet http://idyllmtn.com/ Online Instructor, Accessible Web Design http://kynn.com/+d201
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2001 13:04:21 UTC