Re: Missing Support for XHTML Basic and XHTML 1.1

Christian Wolfgang Hujer:

> your validator currently does not recognize your new standards XHTML Basic
> and XHTML 1.1. It would be very nice to have symbols and document type
> recognition for them.

To this might be added that the page <http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/>
still claims that:
 
  "XHTML 1.0 is W3C's Recommendation for the latest version of HTML"

But on the same page the following is also found:

  31 May 2001: W3C is pleased to announce the publication of XHTML 1.1 -
  Module-based XHTML as a W3C Recommendation,

Is this just an oversight, or is XHTML 1.0 still the current W3C
recommendation for HTML? If so, then what is XHTML 1.1?

-- 
#################################################################
                        Bertil Wennergren
                             PrimeNet
                       <bertil@primenet.se>
#################################################################

Received on Friday, 8 June 2001 13:09:51 UTC