- From: Christian Smith <csmith@barebones.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:42:15 -0500
- To: www-validator@w3.org
- cc: Sofia Lauffs <sofia_lauffs@hotmail.com>
On Tuesday, February 20, 2001 at 16:19, sofia_lauffs@hotmail.com (Sofia Lauffs) wrote: > Fully agree Liam, if there is an error it should be fixed ... however > in this case for exemple there is no error. What is being picked up is > little snips of programming code that has been put in already. I'm not sure we understand. Can you provide an example? > Also small things like pages with a marginheight (and so on) are > correct but will be picked up. You and I know why ... a person who has > not read the fine print doesn't. No, any page which includes a "marginheight" attribute has at least one error (assuming you are validating against one of the published HTML specs). > I constantly use the validator for my own use, but I know how to > interpret what it tells me. For those that doesn't I am suggesting a > more clear explanation. he validator can't be in a position of "interpreting" errors. All it can do is report errors which exist as defined by the version of HTML/XHTML/etc being checked against. -- Christian Smith | csmith@barebones.com | http://web.barebones.com He who dies with the most friends... Is still dead!
Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2001 11:42:21 UTC