Re: W3C Validation says it's right, Tidy says it's wrong. Tidy was right.. [part two]

Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com> wrote:

> Hmmm, an interesting case.  Can anyone explain this in SGML terms?

Basically the same case as:

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2001OctDec/0015

Regards,
-- 
Masayasu Ishikawa / mimasa@w3.org
W3C - World Wide Web Consortium

Received on Friday, 7 December 2001 00:21:08 UTC