- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 08:36:14 +0900
- To: www-validator@w3.org
- Cc: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Forwarded to www-validator because it affects checklink. Regards, Martin. >Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 11:27:50 -0600 >To: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org>, spec-prod@w3.org >From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com> >Subject: anchors in W3C specs >What is the accepted way of doing links in the published >HTML for W3C specs? > >Specifically, I'm concerned with the use link targets such >as <div id="foo"> that are expected to be the target of a >link such as <a href="#foo">. While this is allowable in >XHTML, this is not compatible with HTML and does not follow >the XHTML guidelines for compatibility with HTML browsers; >such links do not work, for example, in Netscape 4.x browsers. > >I have noted an increasing number of such links in W3C >documents, and I note with great concern that the W3C link >validator does not even so much as give a warning for such >links which are effectively BROKEN for all Netscape users. > >Personally, I'd like to see our pub styles indicate that >W3C specs should follow the XHTML compatibility guideline >that suggests targets of the form <a id="foo" name="foo"> >are used, and I'd like to see the link validator give >errors (or at least warnings) for link targets using an >id since that won't work in many of the deployed browsers. > >paul
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2001 18:36:46 UTC